Apr 17 2012

Cannabis for Seniors: 101

A mandatory state class to ensure safe access for seniors has a lot of ignorance to dispel

A tide is coming in. The Baby Boomers are retiring. When they can't live on their own, many go into what are called “adult residential facilities,” or ARFs.

ARFs offer seniors their own little space. They don't have to take out the trash, or mow the lawn, or clean and wash, if they don't want to. There's someone to make sure medications are taken.

But that medication better not be cannabis.

Fifteen years after Proposition 215 enshrined in the state constitution a medical right to cannabis for the sick and dying, the sick and dying and just plain old have the hardest time getting it.

Add a comment Read more...
Apr 15 2012

Amendment 64 and Medical Marijuana

It’s official. Coloradoans will be voting this November on Amendment 64, the Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol act. This landmark legislation raises many issues which will be widely debated in upcoming months as Colorado considers becoming the first state in the nation – and the first geographic area in the world – to make the possession, use, and regulated production and distribution of marijuana legal for adults 21 and older.

How will this Constitutional amendment affect current medical marijuana users, medical marijuana businesses, and the lawyers that advise them? Here are some quick bullet points which provide an overview of Amendment 64 and explore its relationship to Colorado’s existing medical marijuana laws.

Add a comment Read more...
Apr 01 2012

Wait, What’s Legal Now?

The Recent Rulings of Lake Forest v. Evergreen Holistic Collective and People v. Colvin

W

ith every court ruling, safe access becomes harder to figure out. A prime example is City of Lake Forest v. Evergreen Holistic Collective, issued on February 29, 2012 by the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District. Though many had hoped the ruling would clarify the complex interaction of medical marijuana and zoning laws, instead the ruling created as many questions as it answered.

Addressing the issue of cities regulating medical cannabis collectives, in Lake Forest the justices ruled that cities and counties must allow storefront collectives, that all cultivation must be on-site and must be essentially the sole source of medicine for the entire membership. The decision also discusses collective transportation of medical cannabis. Specifically, the justices ruled that collective members do not have an affirmative defense to transport more than their personal amount of medical marijuana to and from a cultivation site.

Add a comment Read more...

Subcategories

Get the Kush Newsletter